<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>god of small beings</title><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/</link><description>The Way Things Are NOT.</description><language>en-UK</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:Am I O.K.?</title><description>Yes it is really nice book. One can assess oneself when one goes in 'adult' or 'child' mode. Many times we forget, there is a little complaining child rooted inside all of us.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/08/03/am_i_o_k~1010249/#c1472558</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 12:39:15 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Selfless Narcissism</title><description>Thanks!&lt;br&gt;
loneliness is not good or bad.It is the way some people are. &lt;br&gt;
But sometimes it is not what you have choosen deliderately and that makes you sad.&lt;br&gt;
Wishing you a funfilled day and an eternal joy of being able to choose the company of whoever you want!</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/03/21/selfless_narcissism~663570/#c851993</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:52:40 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Selfless Narcissism</title><description>Sadness always has a reason, and if the reason isn't external then it can only be internal - our thoughts. Our thoughts create our emotions, and vice-versa. But we can only change our moods by changing our thoughts. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It sounds to me like you are looking for the answers to your sadness externally, when really the only way to be truly happy is to be dependent on ourselves alone. To be able to fulfill ones self. That's not to say that we should be hermits, but only a whole person is attractive to another. Who wants half a person? Only another half a person, and that way lies dependency rather than love.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"They call us lonely when we're really just alone". &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The past - it is important not to be a slave to it, because it isn't ever going to go away. We cannot change what has happened to us. We can only change our reaction to what has happened to us. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't have an answer but I know what it is like to be inside the abyss, and I know that we all have to find our own way out. So I'm just saying to you the things I wish someone had said to me at that time. However, these may not be the things that are right for you to hear, and if so, please disregard them. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/03/21/selfless_narcissism~663570/#c851887</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:31:34 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Greensleeves</title><description>Apparently it was written by Henry VIII although it's in debate.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/01/27/greensleeves~510952/#c626988</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:26:22 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Dear Date sheet</title><description>Happy New Year!!</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/12/30/dear_date_sheet~426448/#c506421</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 20:51:30 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:1.618</title><description>I've read that book! I enjoyed the facts </description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/12/12/1~380099/#c417101</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:07:02 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><description>True. People(read 'devils') like bush belong to no religion, coz no religion can conspire for decimating humans.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c302774</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:49:16 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><description>the worst thing is he is masquerading as a Christian which he most certainly is NOT and neither is his poodle bliar.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c295278</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:25:41 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Flowers for Algernon</title><description>this was an excellent book, and would be worth your while to read it. it is not a scientific book, but a parable on the human condition in this world.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/14/flowers_for_algernon~233894/#c269637</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:57:36 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Minority Report</title><description>I enjoyed the film myself. It proves that science fiction need not necessarily be all about space, laser guns and aliens. I am a big sci-fi fan though and enjoy watching all of the aforementioned.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/14/minority_report~233705/#c253207</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:54:37 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><description>Your blog is full of feeling ;o)</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c252352</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:21:15 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><description>I for one will not wonder (..he's definitely not the clown!).  </description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c252167</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:52:58 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><description>very true, friend.&lt;br&gt;
i liked ur way of writing and analysing things &lt;br&gt;
keep up the good work&lt;br&gt;
bye for now</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c251563</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21:01 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Perfunctory faith</title><description>does it count if you sleep through the fasting lol. sounds like something i would do.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/perfunctory_faith~231900/#c251249</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:34:05 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:life and threads</title><description>Yup it's all mapped out! Just let it Happen, it's all good ;o)</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/05/life_and_threads~217443/#c250517</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:10:02 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Droplets</title><description>It's a sunny morning here too ;o)</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/26/droplets~201621/#c219395</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:00:39 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:GR8 Expectations</title><description>I agree it's cool that you have read GR8 Expectations ;o)</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/12/gr8_expectations~176291/#c213329</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:03:15 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:lost in the wind</title><description>lost in the wind, thats a great poem, its not complicated and gets straight to the point, powerful stuff. more please, i like it.</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c212415</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:35:35 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:lost in the wind</title><description>Thanks for your message&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Are you aware that narcissism means 'abnormal self-love or self admiration'&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
narcissistic means 'someone who falls in love with their own reflection'&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We just thought you might want to think about that, as your message to us about narcissism did not sound too healthy.....&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Your writing on this post is very nice, put your talents to good healthy use - write some more poems on your blog and we will drop by from time to time to read them........&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We wish you good luck &lt;br&gt;
D &amp; D&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c210914</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:12:38 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:cOMMERCIALLY  yOURS</title><description>Has cOMMERCIALLY yOURS  become fashionable.&lt;br&gt;
Look to the genius who started it all - a CAT!&lt;br&gt;
www.cathead.blog.co.uk</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/commercially_yours~182571/#c210404</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:40:18 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:lost in the wind</title><description>Love - can it really do this to you???  Yes I guess it can......DD</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c164844</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:26:54 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Brand Me Against All Brands</title><description>in the olden days when we couldn't think for ourselves due to lack of communication between the masses, the people who decided they were in charge of commerce and the spread of a free market, used to assign something tangable that represented quality and a sense of familiar trust within people, you could rely on anything that was made due to the simple fact not many companies made anything there competitors produced.  Now in todays age, everything is available to the free consumerist society, and the previous idiom of association of label or brand is no longer quite so exclusive  which brings us the question; if this is so, why is exclusivity placed upon certain material gains and what sense does it give that person?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
a good read is Naomi Cline - "No Logo"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/06/brand_me_against_all_brands~164958/#c136211</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:02:27 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:UNREAL TOURNAMENT</title><description>yOU FuCKINg lOSER&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
lEARN hoW To USe casE anD GEt a LIfE&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
p.s  see you have no friends or other replies (LoSeR)</description><link>http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/08/04/unreal_tournament/#c126860</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:02:55 +0200</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
