<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2009-11-14:/</id><title>god of small beings</title><link rel="self" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/"/><subtitle>The Way Things Are NOT.</subtitle><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-14T18:45:46+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2006-08-03:/2006/08/03/am_i_o_k~1010249/#c1472558</id><title>In response to:Am I O.K.?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/08/03/am_i_o_k~1010249/#c1472558"/><author><name>varshakale</name></author><published>2006-08-03T12:39:15+02:00</published><updated>2006-08-03T12:39:15+02:00</updated><content type="html">Yes it is really nice book. One can assess oneself when one goes in 'adult' or 'child' mode. Many times we forget, there is a little complaining child rooted inside all of us.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2006-03-21:/2006/03/21/selfless_narcissism~663570/#c851993</id><title>In response to:Selfless Narcissism</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/03/21/selfless_narcissism~663570/#c851993"/><author><name>adeelkhan</name></author><published>2006-03-21T13:52:40+01:00</published><updated>2006-03-21T13:52:40+01:00</updated><content type="html">Thanks!&lt;br&gt;
loneliness is not good or bad.It is the way some people are. &lt;br&gt;
But sometimes it is not what you have choosen deliderately and that makes you sad.&lt;br&gt;
Wishing you a funfilled day and an eternal joy of being able to choose the company of whoever you want!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2006-03-21:/2006/03/21/selfless_narcissism~663570/#c851887</id><title>In response to:Selfless Narcissism</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/03/21/selfless_narcissism~663570/#c851887"/><author><name>KarenF</name></author><published>2006-03-21T13:31:34+01:00</published><updated>2006-03-21T13:31:34+01:00</updated><content type="html">Sadness always has a reason, and if the reason isn't external then it can only be internal - our thoughts. Our thoughts create our emotions, and vice-versa. But we can only change our moods by changing our thoughts. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It sounds to me like you are looking for the answers to your sadness externally, when really the only way to be truly happy is to be dependent on ourselves alone. To be able to fulfill ones self. That's not to say that we should be hermits, but only a whole person is attractive to another. Who wants half a person? Only another half a person, and that way lies dependency rather than love.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"They call us lonely when we're really just alone". &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The past - it is important not to be a slave to it, because it isn't ever going to go away. We cannot change what has happened to us. We can only change our reaction to what has happened to us. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't have an answer but I know what it is like to be inside the abyss, and I know that we all have to find our own way out. So I'm just saying to you the things I wish someone had said to me at that time. However, these may not be the things that are right for you to hear, and if so, please disregard them. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2006-01-30:/2006/01/27/greensleeves~510952/#c626988</id><title>In response to:Greensleeves</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2006/01/27/greensleeves~510952/#c626988"/><author><name></name></author><published>2006-01-30T17:26:22+01:00</published><updated>2006-01-30T17:26:22+01:00</updated><content type="html">Apparently it was written by Henry VIII although it's in debate.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2006-01-01:/2005/12/30/dear_date_sheet~426448/#c506421</id><title>In response to:Dear Date sheet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/12/30/dear_date_sheet~426448/#c506421"/><author><name>JessicaSmith</name></author><published>2006-01-01T20:51:30+01:00</published><updated>2006-01-01T20:51:30+01:00</updated><content type="html">Happy New Year!!</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-12-13:/2005/12/12/1~380099/#c417101</id><title>In response to:1.618</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/12/12/1~380099/#c417101"/><author><name>JessicaSmith</name></author><published>2005-12-13T11:07:02+01:00</published><updated>2005-12-13T11:07:02+01:00</updated><content type="html">I've read that book! I enjoyed the facts </content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-11-05:/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c302774</id><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c302774"/><author><name>adeelkhan</name></author><published>2005-11-05T14:49:16+01:00</published><updated>2005-11-05T14:49:16+01:00</updated><content type="html">True. People(read 'devils') like bush belong to no religion, coz no religion can conspire for decimating humans.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-11-02:/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c295278</id><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c295278"/><author><name>Jools61</name></author><published>2005-11-02T17:25:41+01:00</published><updated>2005-11-02T17:25:41+01:00</updated><content type="html">the worst thing is he is masquerading as a Christian which he most certainly is NOT and neither is his poodle bliar.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-10-22:/2005/10/14/flowers_for_algernon~233894/#c269637</id><title>In response to:Flowers for Algernon</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/14/flowers_for_algernon~233894/#c269637"/><author><name>Shimon</name></author><published>2005-10-22T08:57:36+02:00</published><updated>2005-10-22T08:57:36+02:00</updated><content type="html">this was an excellent book, and would be worth your while to read it. it is not a scientific book, but a parable on the human condition in this world.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-10-14:/2005/10/14/minority_report~233705/#c253207</id><title>In response to:Minority Report</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/14/minority_report~233705/#c253207"/><author><name>lee954</name></author><published>2005-10-14T11:54:37+02:00</published><updated>2005-10-14T11:54:37+02:00</updated><content type="html">I enjoyed the film myself. It proves that science fiction need not necessarily be all about space, laser guns and aliens. I am a big sci-fi fan though and enjoy watching all of the aforementioned.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-10-13:/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c252352</id><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c252352"/><author><name>JessicaSmith</name></author><published>2005-10-13T21:21:15+02:00</published><updated>2005-10-13T21:21:15+02:00</updated><content type="html">Your blog is full of feeling ;o)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-10-13:/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c252167</id><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c252167"/><author><name>ganesharocks</name></author><published>2005-10-13T19:52:58+02:00</published><updated>2005-10-13T19:52:58+02:00</updated><content type="html">I for one will not wonder (..he's definitely not the clown!).  </content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-10-13:/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c251563</id><title>In response to:BUSH: The  Prophet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/bush_the_prophet~232117/#c251563"/><author><name>u_and_me</name></author><published>2005-10-13T14:21:01+02:00</published><updated>2005-10-13T14:21:01+02:00</updated><content type="html">very true, friend.&lt;br&gt;
i liked ur way of writing and analysing things &lt;br&gt;
keep up the good work&lt;br&gt;
bye for now</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-10-13:/2005/10/13/perfunctory_faith~231900/#c251249</id><title>In response to:Perfunctory faith</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/13/perfunctory_faith~231900/#c251249"/><author><name>tallulahlee</name></author><published>2005-10-13T11:34:05+02:00</published><updated>2005-10-13T11:34:05+02:00</updated><content type="html">does it count if you sleep through the fasting lol. sounds like something i would do.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-10-12:/2005/10/05/life_and_threads~217443/#c250517</id><title>In response to:life and threads</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/10/05/life_and_threads~217443/#c250517"/><author><name>JessicaSmith</name></author><published>2005-10-12T22:10:02+02:00</published><updated>2005-10-12T22:10:02+02:00</updated><content type="html">Yup it's all mapped out! Just let it Happen, it's all good ;o)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-26:/2005/09/26/droplets~201621/#c219395</id><title>In response to:Droplets</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/26/droplets~201621/#c219395"/><author><name>JessicaSmith</name></author><published>2005-09-26T13:00:39+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-26T13:00:39+02:00</updated><content type="html">It's a sunny morning here too ;o)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-22:/2005/09/12/gr8_expectations~176291/#c213329</id><title>In response to:GR8 Expectations</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/12/gr8_expectations~176291/#c213329"/><author><name>JessicaSmith</name></author><published>2005-09-22T11:03:15+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-22T11:03:15+02:00</updated><content type="html">I agree it's cool that you have read GR8 Expectations ;o)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-21:/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c212415</id><title>In response to:lost in the wind</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c212415"/><author><name></name></author><published>2005-09-21T20:35:35+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-21T20:35:35+02:00</updated><content type="html">lost in the wind, thats a great poem, its not complicated and gets straight to the point, powerful stuff. more please, i like it.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-20:/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c210914</id><title>In response to:lost in the wind</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c210914"/><author><name>D &amp; D</name></author><published>2005-09-20T23:12:38+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-20T23:12:38+02:00</updated><content type="html">Thanks for your message&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Are you aware that narcissism means 'abnormal self-love or self admiration'&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
narcissistic means 'someone who falls in love with their own reflection'&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We just thought you might want to think about that, as your message to us about narcissism did not sound too healthy.....&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Your writing on this post is very nice, put your talents to good healthy use - write some more poems on your blog and we will drop by from time to time to read them........&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We wish you good luck &lt;br&gt;
D &amp; D&lt;br&gt;
</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-20:/2005/09/15/commercially_yours~182571/#c210404</id><title>In response to:cOMMERCIALLY  yOURS</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/commercially_yours~182571/#c210404"/><author><name>MichaelStMark</name></author><published>2005-09-20T18:40:18+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-20T18:40:18+02:00</updated><content type="html">Has cOMMERCIALLY yOURS  become fashionable.&lt;br&gt;
Look to the genius who started it all - a CAT!&lt;br&gt;
www.cathead.blog.co.uk</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-15:/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c164844</id><title>In response to:lost in the wind</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/15/lost_in_the_wind~182400/#c164844"/><author><name>SensualReading</name></author><published>2005-09-15T19:26:54+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-15T19:26:54+02:00</updated><content type="html">Love - can it really do this to you???  Yes I guess it can......DD</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-07:/2005/09/06/brand_me_against_all_brands~164958/#c136211</id><title>In response to:Brand Me Against All Brands</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/09/06/brand_me_against_all_brands~164958/#c136211"/><author><name></name></author><published>2005-09-07T14:02:27+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-07T14:02:27+02:00</updated><content type="html">in the olden days when we couldn't think for ourselves due to lack of communication between the masses, the people who decided they were in charge of commerce and the spread of a free market, used to assign something tangable that represented quality and a sense of familiar trust within people, you could rely on anything that was made due to the simple fact not many companies made anything there competitors produced.  Now in todays age, everything is available to the free consumerist society, and the previous idiom of association of label or brand is no longer quite so exclusive  which brings us the question; if this is so, why is exclusivity placed upon certain material gains and what sense does it give that person?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
a good read is Naomi Cline - "No Logo"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</content></entry><entry><id>tag:adeelkhan.blog.co.uk,2005-09-01:/2005/08/04/unreal_tournament/#c126860</id><title>In response to:UNREAL TOURNAMENT</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://adeelkhan.blog.co.uk/2005/08/04/unreal_tournament/#c126860"/><author><name>GHendal</name></author><published>2005-09-01T17:02:55+02:00</published><updated>2005-09-01T17:02:55+02:00</updated><content type="html">yOU FuCKINg lOSER&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
lEARN hoW To USe casE anD GEt a LIfE&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
p.s  see you have no friends or other replies (LoSeR)</content></entry></feed>
